Optimizing Humanoid Arm Actuation: Motor Selection, Material Trade-offs, and Transition to Low-Inertia Tension-Amplified Mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53799/deaa3j54Keywords:
Humanoid robotic arm, Brushless DC motor, Cycloidal drive, LIMS, Cable-driven mechanism, PLA+, kinematics, Inverse kinematics, PID controlAbstract
The optimization of the actuation systems in the humanoid robotic arm is the focus of this research, which considers different factors including motor performance, selection of materials, and innovative mechanisms. By systematically testing a number of Brushless DC (BLDC) motors with different KV ratings and reduction ratios, it was concluded that the 5048 100KV motor with 30:1 cycloidal drive was optimal, with a high KV rating, high efficiency, low weight and low price. According to the voltage analysis, the 24V system doubled the torque, reduced heat generation and increased responsiveness over the 12V system. Comparisons of material properties between 3D-printed PLA+ and aluminum revealed that PLA+ could be used for lightweight prototype making and aluminum could be used for highly loaded parts due to high strength and high precision. The limitations that are faced by the conventional designs (high inertia, mechanical complexity, energy inefficiency) are overcome by proposing to move forward from the conventional design to a Low Inertia Manipulator with High Stiffness and Strength (LIMS). This is a tension amplified mechanism where the tension is amplified using cable driven mechanisms with high torque to weight ratios, low backlash and high compliance as compared to conventional BLDC based mechanisms. The results provide practical guidance in designing a lightweight and energy-efficient robotic arm and indicate that a hybrid approach for the prototyping to production process is necessary and LIMS should be used in the design of next generation humanoid manipulators.
References
[1] J. Kim, S. Park, and H. Lee, "Design and Control of a Lightweight Robotic Arm Using BLDC Motors and Cycloidal Drives," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2345–2358, Aug. 2022.
[2] M. Zhang, L. Wang, and Y. Chen, "Performance Analysis of BLDC Motors in Robotic Manipulators: A Comparative Study," Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–12, May 2021.
[3] A. Smith, R. Brown, and T. Johnson, "Comparative Study of 3D-Printed Polymers and Metals for Robotic Applications," J. Mater. Eng. Perform., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 3456–3468, May 2021.
[4] K. Gupta, R. Singh, and P. Kumar, "Additive Manufacturing in Robotics: A Review of Materials and Applications," Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 145, pp. 1–15, Nov. 2022.
[5] Y. Nakamura, T. Yoshikawa, and H. Ishiguro, "Design and Implementation of a Cable-Driven Robotic Arm with Low Inertia and High Stiffness," IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 567–578, Apr. 2019.
[6] S. Li, W. Zhang, and Q. Wang, "Tension-Based Actuation for Lightweight Robotic Manipulators: A Review," Front. Robot. AI, vol. 10, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2023.
[7] M. Grebenstein, A. Albu-Schäffer, and G. Hirzinger, "Hybrid Actuation Systems for Robotic Manipulators: Combining Motors and Tendon-Driven Mechanisms," Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 125, pp. 1–12, Mar. 2020.
[8] D. Pratt, G. Williamson, and J. Richer, "Compliant Actuation in Humanoid Robots: A Review of Mechanisms and Applications," J. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 345–360, Aug. 2019.
[9] R. Taylor, P. Kazanzides, and J. Funda, "Development of a Low Inertia Manipulator with High Stiffness Using Tension Amplification Mechanisms," J. Mech. Robot., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2022.
[10] E. Richer, Y. Hurmuzlu, and J. Salisbury, "Low-Inertia Robotic Arms: Design Principles and Applications," IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–56, Mar. 2022.
[11] L. Chen, M. Liu, and X. Wang, "Power Optimization in Robotic Manipulators: A Voltage and Current Analysis," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 5678–5689, Jul. 2021.
[12] P. Kumar, S. Sharma, and R. Singh, "Energy-Efficient Actuation in Robotic Systems: A Review of Voltage and Current Management Strategies," Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 147, pp. 1–15, Sep. 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
AJSE contents are under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This permits anyone to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt the work non-commercially provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.